Sunderland have had their fair proportion of howlers within the switch market over time by overpaying for gamers who went on to fail on Wearside.
The likes of Didier Ndong and Jack Rodwell are names that immediately spring to thoughts and there have been loads of different examples within the twenty first century.
One participant the membership had a shocker with from a monetary perspective was central defender Michael Turner, who joined the Black Cats from Hull in 2009.
There may be some controversy over precisely how a lot Sunderland paid to signal the defender, who put pen to paper on a four-year contract on the Stadium of Mild.
The Every day Mail claimed that the charge was £6.5m, while The Guardian initially reported that it was within the area of £12m. Giving the membership the advantage of the doubt, we’ll assume that it was the previous on this case.
Was Turner a poor signing?
Steve Bruce hailed the Englishman’s expertise on the time of the transfer, saying: “I consider that Michael is likely one of the nation’s premier central defenders. I’ve been trying so as to add dimension and energy to the again line and Michael matches the invoice completely in that respect, in addition to being a wonderful technical footballer.”
Nonetheless, he then struggled to maintain up with the excessive commonplace that he set as he performed 39 top-flight matches and didn’t common a rating increased than 6.89 within the following two campaigns.
These statistics recommend that he was removed from being one of many membership’s greatest gamers throughout his three-year spell and the Black Cats opted to money in on him in the summertime of 2012 after his failure to kick on from his debut marketing campaign.
Turner was 28 on the time of the transfer and nonetheless had loads of years left to provide, which means that the membership didn’t really feel he was on the required stage for them anymore.
Due to this fact, Bruce had a shocker with the central defender because it harm Sunderland from a monetary perspective. They spent a web quantity of £5m on him for one good 12 months of service and two common, at greatest, seasons. That definitely means that the signing was not a hit from an on-pitch or off-pitch viewpoint.